Good & Evil {understanding the nature of God}

Polarity is what has divided man kind from the very beginning. {At least as far back as we can trace the origin of man.}

Good and evil – light and dark. One side has suffered as the other side stood victorious.
And it seems that Good always triumphs over evil. Its interesting how things work that way.
You never heard of a nation which conquered another nation call itself ‘the evil ones’.

What is good and evil, going beyond modern and ancient politics and warfare?
Even more so, if there is the notion of good and evil, does this imply that God is both good and evil.
Most Christians would say, “God forbid that one would think such, God being infinite, only has the knowledge of all things…but He, in himself, is not evil.”

Interesting that something can exist without side of God himself.
This would then imply that there is an equal. Christians do not align themselves with the ideal that Jesus and Satan were brothers. After all, Jesus is God and we cant make Satan equal with God – it just wouldn’t be right. Yet at the same time, they are saying this very thing by saying that something exist outside of God himself – primarily that thing being what we call evil.

Good and Evil have been misunderstood by mankind since our fall from grace, so to speak.
Think of it this way, God put the tree in the garden that had both knowledge of Good and Evil.
Christian theologians do not deny that Adam was meant to eventually eat from this tree when he was mature.

But having eaten from the symbolic tree to soon, he became, what we would probably call on the evolutionary scale, a monkey. He took that which was symbol literally and identified with the creation or ego. After all, in Judaism it is taught that Adam was originally a body of light before his fall. He fell into ‘flesh’ or ‘matter’. There are high implications in this view point which I believe quantum physics would support faster than the idea that God was into making fashion clothes out of skin for Adam and Eve.

Think about and contemplate the fall of the ‘watchers’. When they fell, what were the implications for them as well as the earth. Remember that Genesis clearly stated that their offspring was on the earth before and after the flood. Interesting when many Christians are under the false pretense that the flood was to wipe out this generation of people.

I am not going into detail about this, which for most Christians is leaving them hanging, so to speak, on this subject matter. It is delivering to them a perspective on this issue that they are least familiar with, and have not much to compare it to. It would do it more justice if I were to go into more detail, but such topics as this alongside of the nature of good & evil cannot be properly dealt with in a short blog.

The idea is to unite good & evil. God, per say, wants to be ‘understood’.
This shows itself in our relationship with one another throughout the ages.

After all, we are created in the image of God. And if this is so, then we mirror that which is above as that which is above mirrors that which is below.

We too want to be understood.
Its this lack of understanding between each other, and our basic desire, which leads to the constant arguing and bickering between religions. No one wants to hear the other side, and each side is the sole owner of ‘truth’. Ironic indeed is it not?

Whenever you can reach out, relate, & understand someone from where they are coming from, you then are doing what Jesus was doing…showing Love, truly communicating on a heart to heart level.

Jesus showed the same signs that we do. He cried, as we cried – he literally walked a mile (or more) in our shoes. He was never after converting anyone, but meeting them at where they were at.
He used the terms of that milieu to try to communicate a message greater than that age was ready to comprehend.

Even today, we are not ready. We have advanced with technology and science, yet we carry around the archaic symbols and hold onto them for dear life – hoping that within the dead temple we can find life. Life dwells within each and everyone of us, and when we see that light in the other, we then begin to see God.

There truly is a lot more that could be said along these lines, and more that I wanted to share.
Some of this will kind of be out there as if it were poetic prose…as if it too are words wrapped up in the mystery of symbology.

I want to wrap this quick blog up with saying this. God is not what we ‘think’ he is.
He is greater than the confounds of our greatest imagination. God is without limit and has ultimate potential. He can only be known through his attributes which are not him, but tell of his existence.

Nothing that exist, exist without him. (John)
All things live in him and move and have their being.
We are part of the body of Christ with Jesus the head. (second Adam)

There are so many implications here that can, and probably will be expounded upon later.

Let me ask you this. Can you sit in judgement and label that which is good?
It seems easy, but can you be the judge? And that which is bad, have you not seen how in the past such circumstances actually worked out for the good to bring you to a totally different level altogether?

Are we that shallow to really believe that things are really so polarized, that its an ‘us against them’.
As long as we hold that belief, that reality will manifest in our lives.

With that, I bring this blog post to a close. (rough draft, as are all my post. That is the style and nature of this blog for now.)

Until Next Time

Peace

dAlen

3 Responses to Good & Evil {understanding the nature of God}

  1. G. French says:

    This was a wonderful piece of philosophy. I found that these thoughts resonate with my own, and that I can’t help but ponder these things everyday. I realize that I do things that are considered sin, yet my highest desire is to be good to all of creation. We as a species are all very confused and our judgments don’t help the problem, they make it worse.
    Once again, thank you for sharing and feel free to email me anytime.
    GF

  2. dAlen says:

    Thank you G. French for your kind comments.

    Indeed sin is a term that is misunderstood at best and used to create a conceptual prison for the mind at worse.

    Sin, a greek term meaning to ‘miss the mark’ does not denote evil… we ‘sin’ all the time.

    We can only do ‘good’ if we live in the flow of what is and not locked into identifying with every thought that comes through our mind. [i.e. be still and know I am God... I let the rain fall on the good and bad... fear not, etc. - it all points to one general theme that Christians totally miss unfortunately. They can 'see' but do not see... they 'hear' but do not hear.]

    As a society we are pretty much insane and possessed by every thought form that flows through our minds. [fears, judgement, and its a loop that circles around and around and ironically we never see in ourselves that which we point out to others. Sure we are aware and quote boldly the vs. 'watch the log in your eyes when trying to take the spec out of another' - yet we are those very folks with the log in our eyes.

    How can I be sure? The fruit... what is this fruit? All one has to do is to be truly open and honest with oneself... watch the thoughts and emotions without judgement and see what state you truly reside in. And for the most part you will find that [especially in the pentecostal realm] that you have a tone of obsessive compulsives.

    Judaism, Christianity, and yes – Buddhism all link. All one has to do is look at each groups mistics. Now this has been a scary thing for the orthodox mainstream branches who are told that this is near dabbling with witchcraft.

    But what the mystics have, the ‘authentic seekers’ is just that… they desire to have a working relationship with the creator. Not just knowledge, etc. They want to experience God. [Check out Henri Nouwen in Catholicism, Thomas Mertons 'New Seed of Contemplation... Avraham Abulafia with his meditations for Judaic Kabbalah, and even Islamic Sufis whose objective is not some revolution, but a revolution of the soul.

    What one has to realize is that we all cry for change, and then the change is never right. The fact is we are a bunch of lazy folks who are wondering the desert like the children of Israel who will die in our unbelief and unrest of soul.

    For the world to change it will take each person to 'awake' within themselves.
    I have made it a point to people, regardless of belief, that all they need do is to truly seek with all their heart - no new beliefs are necessary, but keep an open heart where you currently are. [and yes that means searching in other fields if that is where your heart is at in the time you are at.] :)

    What one will discover is that indeed “the rain does fall on the good and bad” and that all roads do have the potential to lead to the top of the mountain to look at the same moon… or they have the potential to have one cling to a egoic/false self identity which sees the world as fragmented and separated… and us vs. them.

    Its this very concept that keeps change from arising.

    Anyway… enough babbling, Im not teaching or telling you [or anyone] anything. I and the individuals who read this are ‘one’, as it were and exploring together. [we do not need gurus, teachers, etc. "The spirit will guide and teach you"] We are mere travelers sharing an adventure. :)

    Again thank you for your kind comments, and my apologies for any lack of skill in writing… I tend to always write in stream of consciousness – so all the best. :)

    Peace

    dAlen

  3. ndu says:

    mr alen i am with u on this. since childhood av always wondered if god and d devil were not the same person. like a book having a front and a back. or whether god annexxed his evil side by creating a devil and infusing his evil essence into him so that he would be pure good…. i have wondered and pondered on all the bible contradictions and have come to realise that god is not an individual that is entirely good nor entirely evil. god is a group of spirits choosing to manifest itself in one person, two or more persons. at creation, it said, “let us make man…”. when he visited to commune with man it was one person. god heard the outcry against sodom and said “i will go and see for myself”. when he went down, it was two persons. “and the lord appeared to abraham near th great trees” abraham ran to make food for god and brought it… it was three persons who ate. when in the garden they ate the fruit, god said,” they hav become like US, knowing both good n evil”. this means god were aware of good and evil, meaning that they were capable of both good and evil. man was never created by them to enjoy in the garden. they created man to till the earth n work for them. if adam had never eaten the fruit, man could only have been their image and not their likeness. there are two separate creation accounts in genesis. the one where god creates the earth and the fullness thereof and the one in which “he planted” a garden. couldnt he have created the garden in the same breath? he came down to earth n planted a garden because “the lord god had not caused rain to pour…” and he put man in the garden… why didnt he make rain to fall? are there two separate creators, one who created the world and didnt let it rain and the one who copied and planted a miniature garden??? however, man was placed in the garden and god decided to give adam a mate. they should have gone to look in the world n lead in the animals two by two into d garden like noah did, but they (he) decided to take of the dust in the garden and create animals…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.